Skip To Content

Previous Page TOC Next Page
Click for DHHS Home Page
Click for the SAMHSA Home Page
Click for the OAS Drug Abuse Statistics Home Page
Click for What's New
Click for Recent Reports and HighlightsClick for Information by Topic Click for OAS Data Systems and more Pubs Click for Data on Specific Drugs of Use Click for Short Reports and Facts Click for Frequently Asked Questions Click for Publications Click to send OAS Comments, Questions and Requests Click for OAS Home Page Click for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Home Page Click to Search Our Site

An Analysis of Worker Drug Use and Workplace Policies and Programs

6.2 Likelihood of Working for an Employer Who Tests Employees for Drugs

Figure 6.4 provides information about whether, if given a choice, full-time workers would be more or less likely to work for an employer who tests employees for drug use. For all types of testing programs and for all establishment size categories, current illicit drug users reported that they would be less likely than non-users to work for an employer who tests for drug use. The observed differences were more pronounced in situations in which the hypothetical employer utilizes random testing. Almost 30 percent of workers who reported current illicit drug use, and only 5.9 percent of workers who reported no current illicit drug use, said that they would be less likely to work for an employer who tests for drugs at hiring (the magnitude of this difference is relatively constant across establishment size). Moreover, the overall percentages when asking about random drug testing were 40.4 percent for those reporting current illicit drug use and 11.6 percent for those reporting no current illicit drug use. Only 14.4 percent of current users and 5.9 percent of non-users indicated that they would be less likely to work for an employer who tests for drugs following a work-related accident.

The results also suggest that full-time workers, especially if they reported no current illicit drug use, were less averse to workplace drug testing programs conducted at-hiring or following a work-related accident than programs conducted randomly or upon reasonable suspicion of a supervisor. For example, while only about 6 percent of non-users would be less likely to work for an employer who tests at-hiring or following an accident, more than 11 percent of non-users would be less likely to work for an employer who tests randomly or upon reasonable suspicion of a supervisor. Those reporting current illicit drug use appear to be most averse to random testing programs (40.4% reported they would be less likely to work for an employer who tests) and least averse to post-accident testing programs (14.4% reported they would be less likely to work for an employer who tests).

Previous Page Page Top TOC Next Page

This is the page footer.

This page was last updated on June 03, 2008.

SAMHSA, an agency in the Department of Health and Human Services, is the Federal Government's lead agency for improving the quality and availability of substance abuse prevention, addiction treatment, and mental health services in the United States.

Yellow Line

Site Map | Contact Us | Accessibility Privacy PolicyFreedom of Information ActDisclaimer  |  Department of Health and Human ServicesSAMHSAWhite HouseUSA.gov

* Adobe™ PDF and MS Office™ formatted files require software viewer programs to properly read them. Click here to download these FREE programs now

What's New

Highlights Topics Data Drugs Pubs Short Reports Treatment Help Mail OAS